Within the considerable disarray surrounding the American military actions on Venezuela, the apprehension of leader Nicolás Maduro, and the declaration by Donald Trump that the US will “manage” the country and “reclaim the petroleum resources”, a single fact remains evident – they set a profoundly disturbing precedent.
The United States has a grim history of meddling, military incursions, and control in the region, but the early hours of Saturday saw its initial significant armed assault on the continent of South America. “US supremacy in this hemisphere shall not be challenged from now on,” Mr Trump declared.
The choice to militarily strike another sovereign country and abduct its leader – just a short time after he openly looked for a diplomatic solution – possesses far-reaching consequences. We all have reason to be worried.
Venezuelans have endured a repressive, kleptocratic and incompetent regime under Mr Maduro, largely considered to have rigged the previous presidential vote. They now face extreme instability in the best case. Mr Trump has indicated that Mr Maduro’s deputy, Delcy RodrĂguez would comply with American demands, and rejected conservative dissident leader and Nobel prize-winner MarĂa Corina Machado as a plausible replacement.
However, Ms RodrĂguez, now the interim president, has so far struck a defiant tone – and other elements of the headless administration are far more intransigent.
A man who was elected promising to abandon foreign wars now says he is “unconcerned about deploying troops”. Redesignating the Department of Defense as the Department of War was more than posturing. He no longer views the world’s superpower as a guardian of order; he is transforming it into a rogue state.
He is convinced that the United States' strength enables it to do as it wishes with minimal cost: observe the strikes on Nigeria, on Iran’s nuclear facilities. He promises that control of Venezuela's petroleum means this new undertaking “will pay for itself”.
George W. Bush invaded Iraq on a lie. But this action without legal basis came absent any United Nations mandate or congressional approval; the opposition party was kept in the dark and say they were deliberately deceived in briefings. Mr Trump aims not merely to stretch international norms, but to obliterate them.
Put aside the signal this transmits to leaders in Moscow, Beijing, and beyond, and ask where the US itself is heading. While the raid allegedly resulted in the deaths of 40 Venezuelans, including civilians, no US personnel died. Mr Trump’s escalating feeling of being untouchable will almost certainly fuel more reckless actions.
It is widely rejected the justification that this is concerning narcotics. Venezuela is only a secondary pathway for cocaine; Mr Trump recently exonerated the ex-leader of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernández for drugs and weapons crimes. Mr Trump himself has stated plainly that he is propelled by the lure of oil as well as machismo, the worldview of key officials, and the quest for a legacy as his support at home declines.
The worldwide reception, especially in Europe, has – with a few principled deviations – been shockingly muted. That’s not due to Mr Maduro’s sins, but anxiety over Mr Trump’s wrath. The forceful statement from UN Secretary General António Guterres was notable, but this episode emphasizes the institution’s growing irrelevance.
Mr Trump’s anti-interventionist domestic base could yet press him to turn attention back home – but escalating insurance prices, financial discontent and ongoing controversies increase his appetite for distraction.
It has been less than 12 months into his four-year term. World leaders may live to repent if they fail to speak up today, given what – and who – could be next.
A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in casino strategy and slot machine reviews.